Of David Chalmers - Journal of Consciousness Studies (1995)
The present article introduces and formalizes the epistemological distinction between the 'easy' problems of consciousness (those susceptible to explanation through computational or neural mechanisms, such as the discrimination of stimuli, the integration of information or the reporting of internal states) and the 'hard problem'. The hard problem is to explain how and why the physical processes of the brain give rise to subjective phenomenal experience (qualia). I argue that no functionalist or reductionist materialist explanation can close the explanatory gap, since it is conceptually coherent to conceive of functionally identical systems lacking internal experience (philosophical zombies).
Editorial rereading
This foundational paper by David Chalmers incontrovertibly exposes the absolute bankruptcy of the eliminative materialism that dominates contemporary neuroscience. For decades, the scientific establishment has indoctrinated us with the reductionist premise that the human being is nothing more than a "meat machine", where the mind is a mere epiphenomenon, a temporary illusion generated by the chemical friction of the neuronal synapse. However, Chalmers demonstrates, using relentless logical and analytical precision, that subjective experience (the conscious "I", the qualitative perception of pain, color or distress) is ontologically irreducible to matter. The author formulates the "Hard Problem" to establish an epistemological wall: we can map exactly which neuron fires when we feel sadness, but the neural map will never explain "how" that sadness feels.
From our editorial perspective, anchored in classical realism and rigorous Aristotelian-Thomistic metaphysics, this "hard problem" is not a simple temporal anomaly that tomorrow's science will solve by building brain scanners with more megapixels. It represents, on the contrary, the insurmountable empirical and philosophical proof of the existence of an immaterial vital principle, that is, the spiritual soul. Matter, blind, mechanistic and deterministic, cannot, by its own nature, give rise to self-consciousness or rational intentionality. Stones do not think, and a network of cells (no matter how complex its architectural arrangement may be) remains, fundamentally, matter lacking interiority.
Forced to admit that consciousness must be postulated as an irreducible and fundamental property of the universe (in the same way that physicists postulate fundamental mass or electromagnetic charge), secular philosophy finds itself cornered. It is forced to retreat from its comfortable immanentist dogmatism towards a worldview where form (spirit, act, information) ontologically precedes matter.
This philosophical revelation has enormous sociological and political implications in the modern world. If the mind is not a fortuitous product of biochemical software, the central pillar of contemporary transhumanism collapses resoundingly. Silicon Valley's utopian (and deeply sinister) ambition to "download" the human psyche onto a hard drive, assuming the soul is a reproducible algorithm, is unmasked as a gigantic category fraud. The human being has an immanent dignity that transcends biological metrics, and his intellect participates in the order of the eternal Logos. Denying the hard problem of consciousness is not an act of scientific rigor, but rather an act of blind faith in materialist monism, an atheistic religion that refuses to accept that the universe is inherently mysterious, teleological, and deeply rational.
Legal Note: This critical analysis is carried out under the protection of Art. 28 (news of general interest) and Art. 10 (right of citation) of Law 11,723 on Intellectual Property of the Argentine Republic. The original work and its title belong to its respective author and publication medium, cited on this page.
LEGAL NOTE ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND FAIR USE (LAW 11,723)
The editorial analysis and bioethical rereading constitute an original intellectual work of Editorial Santa Jacinta (DNDA File Registration No. RL-2026-42754029-APN-DNDA#MJ). The citation and reproduction of academic extracts are carried out under the protection of Art. 28 (news of general interest) and Art. 10 (right of citation) of Law 11,723 on Intellectual Property of the Argentine Republic and the Berne Convention. The rights to the original scientific paper belong to David Chalmers - Journal of Consciousness Studies (1995). The quotation or partial informative reproduction of the editorial analysis is authorized, mandatory citing the source ("Editorial Santa Jacinta") with an active link to https://santajacinta.com.ar/papers/afrontando-el-problema-de-la-conciencia-el-reto-de-la-neurociencia-y-el-dualismo-metafisico.